Subscribe
About Us
Virtual Vantage PointsSM examines the influence that online opinion leaders have on everyone else. Online and offline discussions intersect more each day – we look at who’s leading the discussion and why it matters.
Read More »Contributors
Categories
- Aviation
- California-based Conservatives
- California-based Liberals
- Community Engagement
- CR
- Doctors
- Educators
- Environmentalists
- EU elections
- Global Development
- Global Health
- Health Care
- Health Policy
- Media
- Personal Finance
- Political Moms
- Reputation
- Social Media Best Practices
- Trade
- U.S. Elections
- UK Conservatives
- UK Greens
- UK Labour
- UK Liberal Democrats
- Uncategorized
- US Conservatives
- US Liberals
Shared Purpose
Visit Shared Purpose, our new sub-blog on what's next for business and society.
Archives
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
Communicating is About Connecting
Posted by Tara Greco
New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof has been focusing recently on the marketing of causes and social issues. In both his columns and blog posts this past week, Mr. Kristof has cited some examples of good and bad marketing, from his point of view.
Like Mr. Kristof, I believe that marketing, PR and advertising for social issues can either be effective or ineffective—there’s not much middle ground. And, the effectiveness does not necessarily require the latest, cutting edge technologies, or the most-high profile spokesperson. Messages, regardless of how they are packaged, are successful when they make a personal connection to the listener/reader/viewer.
Communicating is about connecting. Whether you’re selling toothpaste or asking someone to help stop genocide, the message has to show people why what you have to say matters and matters to them. Messages that communicate how or why a product/service/idea impacts “my” life are much more successful in generating action—be it a purchase, a request for more information, or a commitment to give time and money to support a cause.
Humanitarians need to tell the story so that people feel that the child at risk could be right next to them, not a million miles away.
For example, CARE’s “I am powerful” campaign conveys a clear, yet inspirational message:
“Your involvement with CARE enables poor women to create lasting change for themselves, their families, and their communities — and ultimately for the world we all share.”
And, Born Learning is a United Way campaign that helps parents and caregivers turn everyday life into fun, learning opportunities for young children. This campaign aims to affect change by inviting everyday people to change how they interact with the children in their care.
What are some other social issue campaigns that effectively make that personal connection with the intended audience?
Tags CR and tagged cause issues, marketing, New York Times, Nicholas Kristof, PR, social issues
. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.